Adriana Bocu is a passionate and professional English teacher, an esteemed national and international conference speaker, as well as a Trinity DipTESOL-qualified teacher trainer with a BA in French and Romanian Literature and an MA in Applied Linguistics. Email: adrianabocu2001@gmail.com

 

"You speak English so well!"—a phrase which is often meant as a compliment, but one that subtly reveals the listener's expectations about what English should sound like. From call centres in Manila to classrooms in Madrid, and from Nairobi boardrooms to online meetings with colleagues from Seoul, English is no longer owned by just a few - it belongs to the world. Yet, one stubborn myth still persists: There is a ‘right' way to sound when speaking English.

Accents are integral to linguistic diversity, yet they are often misunderstood and linked to myths perpetuating stereotypes, such as accents determining intelligence, professionalism, or speech clarity. In reality, there is no single, pure, or perfect English accent. Instead, there are countless ways to sound like a fluent English speaker, each shaped by geography, history, and identity. In this article, we look at the outdated notion of accent hierarchy, explore how the world's diverse Englishes reflect our richness, and redefine what it means to speak English today.

However, these assumptions are largely unfounded, and the myths surrounding accents, different varieties of English spoken worldwide, and the importance of embracing linguistic diversity highlight the need to address these issues.

 

The Myth of the ‘Correct’ Accent

The notion of a single, correct English accent is a sociolinguistic construct, rooted more in social power and historical prestige than linguistic accuracy. While RP, Received Pronunciation, and GA, General American English, have long been regarded as standard varieties, especially in educational and media contexts, they represent only a small fraction of the vast phonetic landscape of English.

Accents are not errors. They are natural linguistic phenomena shaped by geographical, cultural, and social factors. Jennifer Jenkins (2000) notes that accent variation is intrinsic to the nature of English as an international language. The privileging of certain accents over others often leads to what is termed linguistic imperialism (Phillipson, 1992), wherein particular norms are imposed globally, marginalising local or non-standard varieties.

Today, English exists in various forms across the globe, shaped by the linguistic ecologies of its speakers. Scholars such as Kachru (1985) have categorised these varieties into three concentric circles:

The Inner Circle (e.g., the UK, the USA, Australia), where English is spoken as a first language.

The Outer Circle (e.g., India, Nigeria, Singapore), where English functions as a second language and takes on institutional roles.

The Expanding Circle (e.g., China, Spain, Brazil), where English is learned as a foreign language. 

Each circle exhibits unique phonological traits. For instance, Indian English includes retroflex consonants and a syllable-timed rhythm, while Singaporean English (Singlish) displays distinctive intonational patterns and vowel qualities. Nigerian English reflects substrate influences from indigenous languages. These accents do not indicate deficient English; rather, they represent legitimate expressions of linguistic identity. Even within the Inner Circle, notable distinctions arise, particularly between British (European) and American English. British English, for instance, often features non-rhoticity (the ‘r’ at the end of words like car or teacher is typically not pronounced), whereas American English tends to be rhotic, with a strong ‘r’ sound.

Vocabulary and pronunciation also diverge, for example, schedule (/ˈʃedjuːl/ in the UK vs. /ˈskedʒuːl/ in the US), along with the lexical variation, such as flat in the UK and apartment in the US. Even spelling conventions differ, as illustrated by colour  in the UK vs. color in the US. These differences demonstrate that variation is inherent even in what are traditionally seen as "standard" forms, further undermining the myth of one correct English, making accents often serve as powerful markers of identity. 

Lippi-Green (2012) argues that accent discrimination is one of the last socially acceptable forms of prejudice, often concealing deeper issues of race, class, and ethnicity. A speaker's accent can unjustly sway perceptions of intelligence, credibility, and competence, particularly in educational or professional contexts. Yet, for many speakers of English as an additional language, their accent embodies a hybrid identity that encompasses multiple cultural and linguistic worlds. The emergence of translanguaging practices (García & Wei, 2014) among multilingual speakers further challenges the myth of a monolithic, native-speaker model.

The growing recognition of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) challenges the dominance of native-speaker norms. In ELF contexts - such as international business, academia, and travel - mutual intelligibility takes precedence over adherence to native-like pronunciation. Studies show that intelligibility is not necessarily tied to native-like accents but to clarity, rhythm, and listener familiarity (Derwing & Munro, 2005).

Moreover, educators and institutions are increasingly called to adopt a pluricentric view of English, acknowledging the legitimacy of multiple standards and promoting accent tolerance. This shift has implications not only for language teaching and assessment but also for broader social attitudes.

The persistence of accent-related myths reflects deeper social hierarchies and biases rather than linguistic realities. In a truly globalised world, it is time to move beyond the narrow confines of ‘correct’ accents and embrace the rich diversity of Englishes spoken across continents. By valuing intelligibility over imitation and promoting inclusive norms, we pave the way for a more equitable and linguistically aware global community.

 

References

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397.

García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford University Press.

Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Quirk & Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World. Cambridge University Press.

Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an Accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press.

 

Coming soon! Please check the Pilgrims in Teacher Training courses in 2027 at Pilgrims website